​Read online​

Welcome to Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, ​subscribe here.

Do this before you build your GTM ecosystem

I stumbled on a newsletter from GTM expert Maja Voje this week (she was on the podcast, a while ago) where she breaks down what she calls the "GTM ecosystem" — and honestly, it's one of the best frameworks I've seen for how fast-growing companies like Clay, Cursor, and Lovable are scaling so aggressively.

Her model maps it out in rings: the product core at the center, then an activation ring (integrations, templates, AI agents), a distribution ring (creators, communities, platforms), and an expansion ring (agencies, educators, affiliate programs). Growth loops connect them all, and the whole thing compounds when done right.

It's a brilliant way to think about leverage. Growth driven by external actors, not just internal headcount. Distribution embedded into product usage. Monetization that expands beyond the core product.

But here's what hit me as I read it:

None of that machinery works if the message is not consistent as it spreads.

In most SaaS companies, the same product gets explained differently on the homepage, in onboarding emails, inside the product, in sales decks, and by partners or creators. None of these assets might be wrong on their own, but if not 100% consistent, together they create confusion, and dilute the strength of your core differentiating message.

As more people and channels get involved, the message diverges from that core. Users get confused. Growth stops compounding.

A real GTM ecosystem ensures your message stays intact as it spreads through partners, creators, and customers. And that only happens when the everyday assets teams already have — emails, pages, demos, docs, decks — are designed to reinforce the same core idea instead of competing with each other.

The root cause: no foundation to build from

The issue I see typically is that teams rarely have a solid positioning and messaging framework in place. So they don't have a single foundation to use when writing copy.

Without that foundation, every new asset becomes a one-off experiment. Every new partner or creator interprets the product slightly differently. Sales translates marketing messages on the fly. And the more the ecosystem grows, the more the message strays from the path.

Maja's right that ecosystems create leverage. But if you're scaling distribution without a core messaging framework, you're likely scaling a confusing message that will backfire when it’s too late to fix it.

Feedback loops are what keep the message calibrated

Your GTM ecosystem shouldn’t just be a distribution system, but an intelligence system too.

The same channels that carry your message outward should be feeding signal back in. Otherwise you're scaling reach while losing touch with your market.

As you grow the ecosystem and add partners, creators, communities, new product features etc., you have to scale your feedback loops too. You need consistent data about how your audience perceives you, what the market is doing, and how aligned your teams are internally.

The risk is that you can nail the messaging at the start, but the more complex the ecosystem gets, the easier it is to lose touch. And by the time churn ticks up or partner deals slow down, the message has already been drifting for a while.

The early warning signs show up in conversation first: prospects confused about what you actually do, customer success hearing "I thought this would do X" repeatedly, partners describing your product differently than you do, internal teams unable to explain the value prop the same way.

Those are hints you should get before the actual metrics tell you.

A practical system: the Messaging Alignment Sprint

So what's the realistic way to keep the message calibrated as your GTM ecosystem scales?

I'd propose a quarterly sprint, a focused block of time you dedicate to keeping everything aligned, without becoming a whole new operational burden. It’s a recalibration of sorts.

Think of it like how restaurants do a full inventory and menu audit every quarter. They're making sure they’re constantly optimizing their offering for profitability and popularity by gathering both quantitiative and qualitative feedback.

Here's what it can look like for your messaging:

1. Monthly message audit calls Pick 3-5 recordings from recent sales calls, customer onboarding sessions, or partner conversations. Listen for how people describe the product. Note the language they use, the confusion points, the "wait, I thought it did X" moments.
2. Quarterly asset alignment review Pull up your homepage, last month's email campaign, the sales deck, the partner one-pager, and a few recent social posts. Put them side by side. Ask: "If someone encountered all of these, would they think they're about the same company solving the same problem?" Make it a 60-90 minute working session with marketing, sales, and product in the room, and discuss.
3. Internal echo test Once a quarter, ask 5-10 people across different teams (sales, CS, product, partnerships) to write down in one sentence: "What problem do we solve and for whom, and how uniquely/better/differently?” Compare the answers.

The bottom line

A strong GTM ecosystem model can be powerful, but it only works if the narrative stays consistent as it grows across channels and media.

You can build all the rings, activate all the actors, and unlock all the growth loops, but your message needs to stay consistent for you to get the most of it.

Start simple. Pick one of those three feedback loops and run it this quarter.

DISCOVERY

✍️ How I use a journal to think better

Some of the best thinking you do leaves no evidence.

It’s a problem.

For example when a surgeon makes a split-second call that saves a life, or a pilot adjusts altitude before passengers even feel any turbulence.

These decisions are often “invisible”, even to the people who make them.

But this high-level, intuitive thinking is often your highest-value work. And when your highest-value work is invisible, it becomes impossible to recognize in yourself.

So, I started keeping a “clarity journal” this year.

It’s a 3-section pocket-sized journal to help me 1) Learn, 2) Decide, and 3) Act:

1. Learn & reflect: this is where I jot down any lessons or reflections from what I read/watch/experience.
2. Decision journal: here I take some time to annotate important decisions and to look at them as experiments I can learn.
3. Principles: these are the crystallized ideas and frameworks I want to take into the real-world and act from, derived from both the learnings and decisions.

The act of writing down my thinking makes the invisible visible. And it helps me slow down. It creates a record of my reasoning, assumptions, and context that led me there.

Whether it’s deciding on a messaging angle, copy idea, career move, or lifestyle change, over time, the goal is for these entries to become a personal database of how I think. So I can spot patterns, refine my judgment/intuition, and make better decisions faster.

I think we need to build these “muscles” now more than ever.

Do you have a journaling habit or routine? I’d love to nerd out on it.

RESONANCE

Will Guidara, Unreasonable Hospitality

Have a great weekend!

Cheers,

Chris

Chris Silvestri Founder & conversion alchemist

🙌🏻 Let’s be friends (unless you’re a stalker)​

When you're ready, here's a few ways I can help

Not sure where to start? Take our free message-market fit scorecard.​