Welcome to this week's issue of Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. If your audience needs an instruction manual, you’ve already lost themEver get totally thrown off by something that should be simple? Like trying to do laundry for example. The other day, trying to wash some darks turned into a small life lesson about communication—and why it’s so easy to lose your audience when you assume they know more than they do. I’ll admit it—I’m selectively attentive to the extreme. If something doesn’t interest me enough, it practically vanishes from my radar. I know, brutal. And that’s the case for doing my laundry. I don’t care enough, so I—still to this day—really don’t have much of a clear idea of how that’s supposed to work. Not ashamed to say it. So, here I am, staring at this new washing machine, looking for my old go-to setting: cottons. It was all so simple, clean, easy. My world made sense. But here, ohhh nooo. What I got was a bunch of VERY specific temperature settings: 40°C, 60°C, “Delicates,” “Synthetics,” “Spin” (my head definitely was spinning) you name it. When all I wanted was to push “cottons” and let it do its magical thing.
I didn’t want a laundry science lesson—I just wanted clean clothes. What would you do at a restaurant if you wanted a simple cheeseburger, but all you got from the menu were cryptic blurbs like "seared at 400°F," "lightly simmered at 140°F, and "gently fluffed to 30% moisture."? You’d either have to ask the staff for help or get annoyed and leave. So, as most of us now do, I asked ChatGPT. It walked me through the options, and I finally found a setting that worked.
But it got me thinking: This machine assumed I’d know exactly what each temperature means for different fabrics. Spoiler: I don’t. And it’s the same in copywriting—if we assume our audience knows the ins and outs of our product or industry, we’re setting ourselves (and them) up for a lot of confusion and missed connections. What’s their version of “Cottons”?In copywriting, we have to start by meeting people where they are, not where we wish they were. Just this week, one of my clients, a company in data management, shared how they envision their product as the solution to the “death march”. It was a new term for me, so I wanted to dig into what that means exactly and if it really makes sense to our target audience. Enter Voice of Customer (VOC) research, and the treasure trove of insights that is Reddit.
Here’s how a post I stumbled on ended: “6 years, millions of dollars, and no one can put a silver bullet headshot into this shambling zombie death march of a project.” Brilliant. “Death march” wasn’t just a term to them—these guys were living it. It hit home. They could picture it. That single phrase captured every pointless meeting, every budget overrun, every “why are we still doing this?” moment they’d ever had. Compare two headlines: “Get your death march project done efficiently. vs “Finally put a silver bullet headshot into that shambling zombie death march of a project.” Which one do you think would work best? I’m pretty sure the descriptive, vivid, tangible, slightly disgusting image of killing a flesh-eating monster that’s been feasting on your resources for years, will likely resonate better for this audience than an empty promise of “efficiency”. But I can say it because they’re saying it. Now, before doing anything with it I will still want to validate my assumption. One thing I can do is to ask a specific question in my customer interviews. Something like: Imagine a data project that goes horribly wrong – delays, cost overruns, frustrated stakeholders, and ultimately, a failure to achieve its goals. How would you describe that kind of project? What words or phrases come to mind? And then follow it up with: Have you ever heard the term 'death march' used to describe this type of project? What comes to mind when you hear it? Notice I didn't want to lead them into the "death march" term, but rather gradually explore how they see it. Don’t assume your audience is already in sync with you. Figure out what their “cottons” is—the words or phrases that make them feel, “Yep, that’s me.” Remember, you’re joining a conversation they’re already having. What the laundry debacle taught is simple but easy to miss: real connection starts way before engagement. Before you can truly connect, you need to understand your audience’s mental shortcuts, frustrations, and expectations. The greatest compliment your audience can give you isn’t, “I understand you.” It’s, “You understand me.” DISCOVERYYour point of view matters now more than everLoved this piece on how, even UX design, is actually a persuasive argument. It also shows why relying on AI for it will never work as well as when you inject your own personal perspective into it. A well-developed point of view can never be commodified, and so the skills to persuasively articulate it will always be a worthwhile investment. What happens when you put ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini in a room together?I ran an interesting experiment this week as I was trying to get a more unbiased and objective perspective about the ideal junior copywriter candidate to select for Conversion Alchemy. After asking 3 large language models (ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini) for the same objective perspective on two candidates, I then asked each of them for an opinion on the other two AI's responses. Each LLM exhibited different "character" and style. Gemini proved to be the more consultative almost "coach-like" helping me think broader but also giving me its opinion. ChatGPT and Claude were both more one dimensional in their feedback with the latter being more "selfless" by recommending Gemini's response as the most useful one. Understanding what style each AI tool innately has and which use cases one is best for compared to others, is very useful. You're free to use your own expertise and intuition in collaboration the tool, rather than having to think of what to use and when. RESONANCE"Whether you’re at school, a start-up, or a corporation, everyone wants the same things: success, validation, skills, and economic security. And the universe doesn’t care. Desire is necessary, not sufficient." Scott Galloway, The Algebra of Wealth Wanting a better life is just the entry ticket. What matters is the work you put in and how valuable that work is to others. Care about the work and the work will take care of you. Have a great weekend! Cheers, Chris When you're ready, here's a few ways I can help |
I'm the founder and chief conversion copywriter at Conversion Alchemy. We help 7 and 8 figure SaaS and Ecommerce businesses convert more website visitors into happy customers. Conversion Alchemy Journal is the collection of my thoughts, ideas, and ramblings on anything copy, UX, conversion rate optimization, psychology, decision-making, human behavior, and -often times - just bizarre, geeky stuff. Grab a cup of coffee and join me. Once a week, every Friday.
Read online Welcome to this week's issue of Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. The research mistake that kills good messaging On a podcast recently, someone asked me: What’s the biggest mistake product marketers make when researching for messaging? It’s tempting to point to obvious traps—confirmation bias, talking to the wrong users, skipping research altogether. But the deeper issue is simpler: Teams confuse collecting data with doing...
Read online Welcome to this week's issue of Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. The hidden "architecture" rules that decide if prospects say yes Last week I ended up in a YouTube rabbit hole. The video featured Steven Harris, a New York based architect known for blending modernist design with livable comfort. He walked through the five non negotiables he uses when designing his own home. On the surface, it had nothing to do with messaging. But...
Read online Welcome to this week's issue of Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. What craft means (and why you should care) When I first started learning copywriting, my “practice” looked pretty old school: I’d sit down with a notebook and hand copy sales letters word for word. Page after page, until my wrist ached. It was boring, sure, but it drilled into me the rhythm and flow of persuasion in a way no shortcut ever could. Today, you can ask AI...