|
Welcome to Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. Why your AI outputs sound generic (and how to fix it)There’s a concept from Tor Nørretranders’ book The User Illusion that explains why a lot of marketers get crap results with AI. It’s called exformation. It’s the information you deliberately exclude when communicating, so the other person can actually process what you include. In short, good communication is knowing what to cut. Yesterday I had forty-five minutes, on a webinar with Team GPT, to show how I go from research to strategy and copy for B2B SaaS clients. Cramming everything into that time window forced me to see something I’d been doing intuitively: you can get great results from AI only if you know what to cut at every stage. Most people treat AI like a dumping groundHere’s how most marketing teams use LLMs: They open a chat, upload everything from research files, to strategy docs, to interview transcripts, to competitor analyses, and persona cards. Oh and finally that Slack thread from last week’s positioning workshop — because, why not… Then they ask: “Write me a homepage hero.” What comes back? Vague. Or bloated. Or weirdly generic despite all that context sitting there. Here’s why that happens. You’ve handed the AI the job you should’ve done yourself — deciding what actually matters. The model is trying to reconcile contradictions, average insights, and guess at what’s most important. It’s too much work all at once. You’d never throw all of that stuff to a junior or an assitant and tell them, “go ahead and do it”. Would you? How I actually move context through my processHere’s what works for me (and what my forty-five-minute constraint on the webinar made obvious). I move context through stages and across different chats or projects. At each stage, I deliberately compress it, and decide what doesn’t need to get passed on to the next. Stage 1: Raw research This is the widest point - Customer interviews - Sales transcripts - Support tickets - Competitor copy and analyses - Review mining - Product knowledge And more. Everything goes in (as long as we cover internal, external and market research). But—and this is the key—I don’t reuse this raw material to write copy. Not even to create the strategy, yet. I use it once to build a Research & Insights Report which is the condensed, synthesized version of all the research we’ve done. This is the first step of exclusion. Stage 2: Positioning and messaging When I move to positioning and messaging, I don’t feed the AI those fifty pages of transcripts. I give it the Research & Insights Report (and the templates it needs to create my strategy documents). That’s it. From that, I build the Positioning Canvas. Then the Messaging Framework and the Value Proposition Canvas. Each document gets more specific and focused in its use case. Stage 3: Copywriting When I’m writing homepage copy or a sales deck, I don’t go back to the research report, but use the Positioning Canvas, Messaging Framework, and Value Proposition Canvas as knowledge base data. Those documents carry forward only what passed two rounds of compression. The funnel narrows at every stage, the context gets tighter and the signal gets stronger. Why this is harder than it soundsHere’s what sucks for most people: excluding information feels risky, and knowing what to exclude is hard work. What if I need that detail later? What if the AI misses something important? What if I’m cutting the insight that would’ve made the difference? So people include everything. Just in case. But that’s FOMO. Practicing exformation means making calls. You decide what matters for this specific task and trust that the rest doesn’t need to follow. You have to believe the compression itself is what creates value and clarity. Raw transcripts are essential for extracting insights and VOC, but they’re too much when you’re drafting a headline. Positioning matters for messaging. But when you’re writing a product page, you need the distilled promise, not the full strategic rationale behind it. The skill is knowing what to leave behind. What actually changes when you do thisWhen you compress deliberately at each stage: The AI gets clearer instructions because you’ve done the editorial work. You’ve already decided what matters for this stage, and the model just needs to execute. Your outputs get better because the signal-to-noise ratio is way higher. Your process gets faster because you’re not re-litigating the research every time you write a headline. You compressed once, and now you move forward. Which, let’s be honest, is the work we used to do before AI was a thing. We’re just picking convenience over quality now. And it’s a shame, because doing this work is how our thinking improves. The act of compressing is the strategy work. Deciding what to exclude forces us to clarify what we actually believe. The work you can’t automate is deciding what the AI needs to do this specific job. Not everything you know. Just what it needs right now. DISCOVERYMy takeaways from the London Turing x SYSTM Growth SummitIf you want a deeper look at what I took away from the Turing Fest × SYSTM Growth Summit — especially the parts that matter for messaging in 2025 — I broke down the biggest insights in a LinkedIn post. It covers differentiation, alignment, JTBD, AI’s impact on research, and why most teams still treat messaging like a one-off artifact instead of a system. You can read the full breakdown here. Going live today 🔥I recently joined Emilio Garcia on Demand Gen Studio to talk about how AI is transforming customer research and messaging strategy. 💡 Synthetic research (and where it actually works) 🧠 Using AI to uncover buyer psychology 🎯 Structuring research so your copy writes itself RESONANCE"A man's true mind can be known through a single word" Yamamoto Tsunetomo, Hagakure Have a great weekend! Cheers, Chris 🙌🏻 Let’s be friends (unless you’re a stalker) When you're ready, here's a few ways I can helpNot sure where to start? Take our free message-market fit scorecard. |
I'm the founder and chief conversion copywriter at Conversion Alchemy. We help 7 and 8 figure SaaS and Ecommerce businesses convert more website visitors into happy customers. Conversion Alchemy Journal is the collection of my thoughts, ideas, and ramblings on anything copy, UX, conversion rate optimization, psychology, decision-making, human behavior, and -often times - just bizarre, geeky stuff. Grab a cup of coffee and join me. Once a week, every Friday.
Read online Welcome to Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. How to see through space and time You have twenty customer interviews. Three hundred survey responses. Sales calls. Support tickets. Battlecards. Enough raw data to build a category-defining message. Yet, it still takes three weeks to synthesize, and no one onws the process. By the time you've pulled the "insights," two competitors have repositioned and your narrative already needs work...
Read online Welcome to Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. How to scale messaging across multiple products and audiences Your team knows what you sell. You've defined your positioning. And you have a decent handle on your ICP. But when someone opens a blank doc to write homepage copy, sales deck content, or a nurture email, they stare at the cursor of doom. Writing every word feels a negotiation between what you know, what your stakeholders told...
Read online Welcome to Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, subscribe here. The two signals that actually convert B2B prospects A potential client recently told me why they reached out after hearing me on a podcast: “You gave the feeling you did what you were talking about and could give us value. And also that you had a clear messaging for your target.” They didn’t hire me for my frameworks or insights. They hired me because I signaled two things: I’ve done the...