​Read online​

Welcome to Unpacking Meaning. If you received this from a friend and enjoy it, ​subscribe here.

Why your pipeline is stuck (and why it's not your sales team's fault)

This is what happens when pipeline stalls at a SaaS company:

The CEO calls in the VP of Sales, “The leads are not converting!” → The VP of Sales runs a training, “The team needs better scripts, let’s get this done”. → The Head of Product gets pulled in, “We need to ship new features, and fast”.

And then nothing changes, because the problem was never in that room.

The problem is usually two rooms earlier.

The prospect is sitting at their desk, reading your website after a pretty intense back and forth with ChatGPT (who, btw just confirmed their deepest bias to a point of delusion), and they have no reason to say yes. Not yet. Not before they have even talked to anyone at your company.

They do not have the context they need to place your product in a bucket. And without that context, your differentiators have no chance to land, those shiny new features don’t register, and your entire pitch arrives and bounces off a wall that was not there.

It’s a positioning problem, but it’s rarely treated like one.

Positioning is the context before the conversation

Most companies treat positioning as the value prop on your homepage. Or the tagline in your deck. Or the way your CEO describes the company in a VC meeting.

It’s not. Your positioning is the mental scaffold a buyer uses to make sense of what you do — before they have evaluated anything.

Here what happens in their brains:

1. Buyer encounters your product
2. They need to figure out what category you belong in
3. Once they find out, they enter your space (which they might or might not be familiar with)
4. Only then can they evaluate whether you are better than alternatives in that space
5. And only then do differentiators/features mean anything to them

Most companies think about their positioning and consequently write their messaging as if buyers started at step five. Big mistake.

Slack did not win because it had better messaging features than email (even though it did), but because it became the obvious better answer to how teams should communicate. Zoom did not win on video quality (though it was good), but because it became the verb for video calling before the competition could plant that flag.

What’s common in these examples? Positioning came first, and the differentiators had somewhere to land.

The three questions every buyer is asking

I work with a framework I call the three yesses (there are more but these are the core). In order to engage with a brand, buyers need to say yes to these three questions:

1. Is this for me?

Not is this good, but is this for me specifically. Companies with broad, generic positioning fail this test in the first 5 seconds of a prospect landing on their homepage.

2. Does it solve my actual problem? / Does it help me achieve my goal?

Not the problem you wish they had. The problem they are grappling with right now, at their desk, on a Tuesday, in between those ChatGPT tabs. And not the goal you’re getting from that one-page ICP deck, but the goal they’ve been telling their coworkers or shared on a Linkedin rant last week.

3. Do I trust them?

A not here: trust is not a feeling, it’s a conclusion. Trust comes from relevance (accumulated in the steps above) + consistency (from a product, website, and message) that tell the same story everywhere.

If your positioning does not have them answer YES to all three questions, your sales team is working uphill. Every conversation starts from zero context and you need to create a better, clearer shared conversation with your audience.

The top mistakes I see most

1. Feature-led messaging

We do X, Y, and Z with our AI-powered platform. Rarely is your ICP thinking in features. They think in problems they are tired of having. Balancing benefits and features is important when you know your ICPs levels of awareness and sophistication, and what language they use. Your job is to match that and there’s no one-time fits all rule.

2. No primary anchor

Trying to stand for everything means you stand for nothing. Pick the one thing that earns the first yes. That’s your positioning’s job.

3. Borrowed competitor language

We do X, but better. You are borrowing someone else vocabulary and handing them the positioning advantage. Buyers already have a word for the incumbent, no need to show them you see them as the top dog (even though that’s useful for comparison pages where you show them where and why you’re best at something they don’t cover).

4. Narrative inconsistency

Your homepage’s messaging completely diverges from or hits different themes from your Linkedin or your sales deck. Your buyer picks up on this instantly and it erodes trust before the first call. Hint: it’s a sign you don’t have a messaging system.

5. AI-powered as a differentiator

It is 2026. Every SaaS has AI in it. Saying AI-powered is like saying cloud-based. It’s table stakes, not a reason to buy. Next will be “agentic”, keep an eye on it.

6. ICP too broad

The wider your target, the shallower your message. When you try to speak to everyone, nobody hears themselves in it. I’ve chatted about this with Arielle at Balsamiq on a teardown of their homepage.

7. Fighting the wrong enemy

Positioning yourself against a competitor you do not actually compete with is a waste of every word. Buyers see through it. This happens when you don’t ask your sales team who they stumble on in deals. On the other hand, you might benefit from addressing the “status quo” people might go for, even if it’s not a direct competitor.

The real number behind the problem

Here is a stat I come back to every time:

​88% of B2B SaaS buyers come to a sales meeting already familiar with the vendor.

Before a prospect fills out a form, before they get on a demo call, before they talk to anyone on your team, they’ve already decided whether your product is worth evaluating. If your positioning is weak or confusing, they arrive at that first conversation already skeptical. Already confused about why you are different, which means already half-checked out.

You are not just losing conversions at the bottom of the funnel, but at the very top too, before anyone from your company has even had a chance to make the case.

What repositioning actually looks like

I worked with a Findymail recently. They have to deal with a super crowded space, but their product is genuinely differentiated. Problem was that they struggled to actually see that differentiation, which ultimately led to copy that wasn’t converting as they wanted it to.

(Homepage before)

We did not add traffic, we did not change the product, and we did not retrain the sales team. In reality their sales team was of huge help in the project.

What we did, was reworking their positioning to lead with what the company actually offers now, trusted B2B contact data with the only guarantee in the industry, and unequivocal third party proof (from Clay). All these were exactly what their buyers wanted to hear from a solution in the space.

(Homepage after)

Conversions doubled in the first 3 months while deploying the new messaging.

2x lift, from positioning work.

Yes we rewrote the copy, and added pages, but none of that work would have been any good if we didn’t create a different conversation, the right context for prospects.

Btw, if this sounds familiar and your pipeline could use a repositioning reset, book a conversion experience audit — 3 days, written and video recommendations of what do fix and how.

The real reason companies do not fix this

Every company I have worked with that had a positioning problem knew it. Most of them did not fix it because:

• It felt too abstract to prioritize over the next feature launch
• The sales team kept asking for more collateral instead of better positioning
• Nobody wanted to own it, so it stayed in the too-hard bucket
• Blaming the website copy not converting was the most obvious signal

The irony is that repositioning is usually the highest-leverage thing a company can do. One change at the top of the funnel improves everything downstream, without changing anything in your product or process.

But it requires someone to say: the problem is here. And most companies do not have anyone whose job it is to say that.

Well, this is what I do.

I work with B2B SaaS companies on positioning, messaging, and conversion copy. The work is: figure out what the right context is, then say it in a way that makes buyers say “yes, that is exactly what I need”, before they ever talk to sales.

If your pipeline is stuck and your team keeps looking at the wrong end of the funnel, let us talk.

Here are two ways to get a proper reset. 1) you can book a $499 conversion experience audit, or 2) fill out this form and I’ll point you in the right direction.

DISCOVERY

I have been thinking about a piece I saved this week — “Cyborgs Will Kill the Corporation” by Octopusyarn, which is about how traditional organizations will be replaced by humans each working with their AI agents to coordinate and achieve goals, while trusting other humans with their agentic team too. But, in a way the piece is also about what happens when AI agents start making buying decisions on behalf of these humans. Not just assisting them, but being the economic actors themselves.

When AI agents are doing the procurement research, the positioning signals that work on humans will not work on them the same way. The story you tell, the brand you project, the emotional resonance you build — little of that transfers to a system that evaluates based on API endpoints and use-case matching.

Which means the companies that win the next phase will not just have good positioning for humans. They will have position that survives machine evaluation. Clear enough function, specific enough category, unambiguous enough differentiation for an AI to route the buying decision correctly.

I am still working through what that means for copywriters and marketers. But it is the kind of question that does not have a right answer yet. But it’s the kind worth sitting with.

I talked about this and why judgment beats execution every time, on the Sproutworth podcast ecently. We cover the three-layer customer research system most teams skip, how to find unclaimed positioning angles, and why AI answer engines are about to make your messaging strategy even more important.

​Check out the episode here!​

​Another great piece I stumbled on, from Taylor Pearson who wrote about Vannevar Bush’s 1945 essay “As We May Work” — the piece that anticipated hypertext, personal computing, and the internet by imagining a machine that could store all of a person’s knowledge and build connections between ideas.

Bush asked: how do we organize human knowledge at scale when it’s growing faster than any filing system can handle? Sound familiar? Replace “books and microfilm” with “content and AI agents” and the problem is the same one. Great read to understand where we’re headed (and why you should try Claude Code if you haven’t yet).

RESONANCE

Charles Duhigg, Supercommunicators

Have a great weekend!

Cheers,

Chris

Chris Silvestri Founder & conversion alchemist

🙌🏻 Let’s be friends (unless you’re a stalker)​

When you're ready, here's a few ways I can help

Not sure where to start? Take our free message-market fit scorecard.​